+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Hook Up Culture

  1. #1
    SB Master
    Points: 17,977, Level: 58
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 373
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    250 Experience Points500 Experience Points1000 Experience Points5000 Experience Points7 days registered
    Isaku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    4,621
    Points
    17,977
    Level
    58
    vCash
    500
    My friend is on the staff at Tuft's University newspaper and he pointed me to this fairly good article by a friend of his. Its interesting, there are flaws, but its worth a read:

    Whatever happened to dating? College students have been asking that question for years. Every once in a while, even a newspaper will pick up the question and interview a few co-eds. The reporter finds dating's departure mostly blamed on what is universally called "the hook-up culture". While there are no (as of yet) proposals for the Senate to take on a Hook-up Culture Rep, I do not think many would deny that the culture is here and thriving at Tufts. But where did it come from? And is it here to stay?

    The hook-up culture is simply an environment that expects casual sexual encounters that do not necessarily lead to anything further. Common sense would say that people hook-up for basic physical needs. They do not want to get involved in a relationship, but they do have intense desires for a sexual partner. In a word, they are horny. So they hook-up -- either with a friend or a stranger. But something makes me think folks hook-up for something more than just the raging hormones.

    What makes me think horniness cannot fully explain the hook-up culture is this question: Would you hook-up with someone who was fast asleep -- totally unresponsive? You could kiss them, touch them, make them touch you, whatever you would like. But they would remain completely oblivious to you and just lay there dead to the world. Not exactly appealing, is it? A bit like eating cold oatmeal. All the physical parts are there, all the same sensations, but something is missing -- an energy, a spark, a life. There must then be a pleasure that is not strictly physical. What makes a hook-up more desirable than any pornography or anything you could do to yourself is the one pleasure neither of those could ever provide -- the consent of a partner.

    A lively, animated partner is lively and animated for you and (for the moment at least) you alone. You are special. What your partner does not let the world see, she lets you see. Personal space that is ordinarily walled off from the outside world becomes open to you alone. You are being let in, given privileged access. You become, for a few moments, the center of his attention. The real thrill of a hook-up is not simply what you do with a partner, but the fact that your partner wants to be doing it with you! It is not just "She's so hot," but "She's so hot and she wants me!" Not just "He's so cute," but "He's so cute and he likes me!"

    The physical pleasure does not, and cannot, exist by itself. It is inextricably tied up with the emotional. The body and soul are one. To give someone your body is to give them all of yourself. A sexual encounter is in its essence an act of deepest intimacy, and so to be considered worthy of that intimacy is powerfully affirming and very exciting. Everyone wants to be loved that much. Consensual sex is an affirmation so powerful that the porno fiend fabricates it and the rapist steals it. It is a feeling of acceptance so intoxicating that it gets pursued weekend after weekend in frat after frat.

    Is it being found there? Well, how could it be? How can you find love and intimacy in a system that presupposes the meaninglessness of sex? If sex is simply handed out to anyone, then sexual intimacy becomes no big deal. Even if it happens to get handed over to you, you are no longer special. You are just a fling. The premise of the hook-up culture is to receive pleasure without commitment. But the pleasure really being sought can only come from commitment, from someone saying "Yes, I want to give my all to you and no one else." But hooking-up is all about holding back, not giving all of one's self, not committing. The more that commitment gets detached from sex, the less sex means anything. The less it means anything, the less enjoyable it becomes, and so the more hook-ups are made to get the old thrill. And on it goes, spiraling down. Trying to find intimate fulfillment by hooking-up is like trying to dig your way out of a hole in the ground.

    Some people claim that they are not at all bothered by emotional needs. They get a thrill from the display of independence and sexual virility that serial hook-ups can give. Now this used to be said mostly by men. They do not talk like this much anymore (at least in public), as it seems to hinder their ability to get much play.

    Appeals to self-determination and sexual empowerment to support hook-ups are now given by women. And this I find strange. I wonder what is so empowering about being, in essence, an unpaid prostitute. The boys may politely clap and publicly congratulate the women for liberating their sexuality and owning their miniskirt and so on, but privately they are having a good laugh and passing the word on who is the easy lay. A woman who embraces the hook-up culture is simply making it easier for guys to treat her as a sex object. Is this women's liberation? Both sexes can use a partner for their own selfish gratification, but more often than not, it is the woman whose hopes of a relationship get tossed in the trash. The real sexual power a woman has is to refuse to give away sex until the man has proved his commitment to her.

    The hook-up culture is very deceptive. Hooking-up promises to be liberating and strengthening. Yet people find themselves needing more and more 'liquid courage' to even make the first move. Hooking-up promises fun and fulfillment and no regrets, but when morning comes it delivers the 'walk of shame.' The hook-up culture has tricked us. It has led us to believe that our emotions are disconnected from our bodies, that love is divorced from sex.

    What can we do about it? Well, a culture only lasts as long as people are willing to live it. If we refuse to believe its false promises, then we can build a new culture that says sex is just too good to be thrown around. We can bring back some middle ground between random hook-ups and being joined-at-the-hip. We can bring dating back to life. Or not. We can also make the break between love and sex complete and final. We can become dead to the ache within for intimacy. We can consider ourselves simply people with assets: he has what she wants, she has what he wants. Just a mutual exchange. Just business. Cold, soulless, heartless, loveless business.
    "While most men are constantly trying to work as hard as they can in order to add a little more mass to their bodies, the majority of women seem to believe that they have been blessed with the most extraordinary genetics ever and that they will blow up once they touch a weight."

    Res Ipsa Loquitur

  2. #2
    SB Addict
    Points: 4,970, Level: 29
    Level completed: 90%, Points required for next Level: 30
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran1 year registered3 months registered31 days registered7 days registered

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    134
    Points
    4,970
    Level
    29
    vCash
    500
    Anyone who has time for dating in university isn't getting their money's worth out of their tuition. That's why hook-ups are popular, they allow people to release tension without creating baggage they have no time for. Why should someone masturbate when they can have sex? Sex with feeling behind it is better, but culminating that takes time you don't have at that period in your life. Besides, having sex with many different people will make you better in bed as you learn to read common body language and responses.

  3. #3
    SB Master
    Points: 8,869, Level: 40
    Level completed: 55%, Points required for next Level: 181
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    100 Experience Points250 Experience Points500 Experience Points1000 Experience Points7 days registered

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Belize
    Posts
    1,404
    Points
    8,869
    Level
    40
    vCash
    500
    Who is the better physicist, the person who studies physics, or all of the sciences?
    Twig Bear

  4. #4
    Mr Fixit Extraordinaire
    Points: 25,245, Level: 69
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 355
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    500 Experience Points1000 Experience Points5000 Experience Points10000 Experience Points7 days registered

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    7,429
    Points
    25,245
    Level
    69
    vCash
    488
    Originally posted by dazedandconfused@Apr 8 2004, 03:28 AM
    Anyone who has time for dating in university isn't getting their money's worth out of their tuition.
    I beg to differ.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Hook ' Em.
    By Lioness in forum Stupid-Boy Sports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-23-2010, 12:48 PM
  2. British gang culture
    By Payaso in forum News, Media and Politics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-18-2008, 01:46 PM
  3. To hook up or to not...
    By californiaqt in forum Poor Relationship Relations
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-18-2007, 02:26 AM
  4. I'm Starting New Pop Culture
    By MakeMeSomeFoodHo in forum Community Banter
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-20-2005, 07:10 PM
  5. Where's the culture?
    By Bender in forum Rant of the Day
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-12-2003, 01:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Powered by Website Maintenance Labs

Copyright ©2000 - 2009; Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.2