+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: Creationism

  1. #16
    SB Veteran
    Points: 25,253, Level: 69
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 347
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    500 Experience Points1000 Experience Points5000 Experience Points10000 Experience Points7 days registered
    Brewtality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Liverpool, England
    Posts
    7,424
    Points
    25,253
    Level
    69
    vCash
    500
    It's not impossible to know 'how we were created' though is it? We know where human beings came from. We understand the ongoing process of evolution. We understand how the universe is expanding and therefore must have once occupied a single point (unless our universe was 'squeezed' through such a point from another dimension) so we know quite a bit about how we were created....just not why. Although the 'why' is quite irrelevent seeing as it is a distinctly human question. 'How' is simple because the answer is just a description of an event or process. 'Why' requires a motive which requires a consciousness and that's something we cannot speculate on without resorting to making things up.
    The broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes... Adolf Hitler

  2. #17
    Tia
    Tia is offline
    SB Master
    Points: 11,771, Level: 46
    Level completed: 95%, Points required for next Level: 29
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    250 Experience Points500 Experience Points1000 Experience Points5000 Experience Points7 days registered
    Tia's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    guess, mi amigo
    Posts
    1,930
    Points
    11,771
    Level
    46
    vCash
    500
    Quote Originally Posted by Brewtality View Post
    Although the 'why' is quite irrelevent seeing as it is a distinctly human question. 'How' is simple because the answer is just a description of an event or process. 'Why' requires a motive which requires a consciousness and that's something we cannot speculate on without resorting to making things up.
    Exactly. So many people forget that the universe doesn't need a 'why.'

  3. #18
    SB Member
    Points: 841, Level: 11
    Level completed: 28%, Points required for next Level: 109
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    100 Experience Points1 year registered3 months registered31 days registered7 days registered

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    17
    Points
    841
    Level
    11
    vCash
    500
    Quote Originally Posted by Brewtality View Post
    It's not impossible to know 'how we were created' though is it? We know where human beings came from. We understand the ongoing process of evolution. We understand how the universe is expanding and therefore must have once occupied a single point (unless our universe was 'squeezed' through such a point from another dimension) so we know quite a bit about how we were created....just not why. Although the 'why' is quite irrelevent seeing as it is a distinctly human question. 'How' is simple because the answer is just a description of an event or process. 'Why' requires a motive which requires a consciousness and that's something we cannot speculate on without resorting to making things up.

    Of all the posts in the philosophy part of this forum, that was probably the most intelligent thing said yet. Your statement makes complete sense, but when i said we i meant the universe in general. Not just human beings. I believe in Darwin's Evolution Theory. That's where humans came from, and it has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that we evolved from other primates. We have the universe traced back scientifically to milliseconds before the big bang. Supposedly. =]

  4. #19
    SB Member
    Points: 423, Level: 7
    Level completed: 23%, Points required for next Level: 77
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    250 Experience Points100 Experience Points3 months registered31 days registered7 days registered

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    2
    Points
    423
    Level
    7
    vCash
    500
    Some real food for thought here. I agree with so many points.

    But What about Lateral design? It seems to me that linear trends of thought in percieving how the universe functions, are having a monopoly on us moderns, so much so that our scientifc world-view is often linear.

    I think some scientists are guilty of having funnel vision when they exclusively follow their singular thread of science, and lose sight of the woveness of the whole. Dawkins, for example, reduces the driving force behind reality to selfish genes. But for me, this is only one working model and perspective.

    I grasp linear design when I engage in Darwins theory of evolution via natural selection. But I grasp lateral design when I comprehend the atmosphere of Earth, frozen for a moment in time, with vertical design, as we know it today, conducive of the various forms of life which coexist and live in a harmony / forms of life with multi-purposes serving a greater equilibrium. It takes a human in the sensual world which only us humans live in, to really engage the whole scene, and let it form an overwhelming impression on us. A sun-lit garden, the flight of the honey bee pollenating the flower, the scent of the flowers, the taste of the honey, the whole mental comprehension of the whole symphony of interwoveness to the faculty of the mind, designed specifically for the given thought.

    I know why Kant felt there must be a bening creator behind the world.

  5. #20
    SB Addict
    Points: 7,249, Level: 36
    Level completed: 50%, Points required for next Level: 201
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    100 Experience Points250 Experience Points500 Experience Points1000 Experience PointsThree Friends
    KlitEastwood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    on the computer in Texas
    Posts
    488
    Points
    7,249
    Level
    36
    vCash
    500

    God is the creator

    There has to be a creator of all this. Darwins theory is just inconsistent. For example, people in China risk their lives to worship God everyday in house churches. The government there doesn’t want them to know the truth. Why? Because they know that there is a God. JEDP is all lies also. There’s no archeological evidence for all of sciences theories. The Bible has many archeological findings that concur with the writings of the Bible. I wouldn’t put my faith in science but only on Jesus Christ.
    Last edited by KlitEastwood; 05-07-2010 at 09:07 AM.
    "My girlfriend is dead ya know, She fell off a cliff and died on impact."-Happy Gilmore

    "Veronica Vaughn, sooooo hot, want to touch the hinny!" -Billy Madison

    GIFSoup

  6. #21
    SB Veteran
    Points: 25,253, Level: 69
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 347
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    500 Experience Points1000 Experience Points5000 Experience Points10000 Experience Points7 days registered
    Brewtality's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Liverpool, England
    Posts
    7,424
    Points
    25,253
    Level
    69
    vCash
    500
    Er, that's anti-logic right there. Yet you're trying to use something which has absolutely no bearing on natural selection and evolutionary biology as an example of one of the flaws in the theory of evolution? FAIL.

    The whole post is one big lump of fail in fact.
    The broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes... Adolf Hitler

  7. #22
    SB Master
    Points: 19,251, Level: 60
    Level completed: 51%, Points required for next Level: 299
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    250 Experience Points500 Experience Points1000 Experience Points5000 Experience Points7 days registered
    Esternogligen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    4,152
    Points
    19,251
    Level
    60
    vCash
    500
    Wow the site's formatting is even more F'd up.
    I hate Vbulletin.
    Quote Originally Posted by Brewtality View Post
    Don't get me wrong here, I'm not some anti-science freak or anything, I just think that there is a limit to the potential of human knowledge and that we cannot necessarily distill the universe down into our earthly languages. As I'm sure you're a fan of Wittgenstein too I don't think I need to go further into that stuff.

    I just think there is the potential for a lot of things which we simply can't explain with science at the moment.
    Agreed.
    "Shit happens. Character is how you react to it."

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Should Creationism be Taught in Schools?
    By Trionix in forum Philosophy, Religion and Spirituality
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 08-13-2009, 10:18 PM
  2. Stop Teaching Creationism
    By Atom' Package in forum News, Media and Politics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-22-2006, 06:41 AM
  3. Creationism Makes So Much Sense Now
    By Mindscrape in forum Philosophy, Religion and Spirituality
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-23-2004, 04:18 AM
  4. Creationism
    By Digity in forum Philosophy, Religion and Spirituality
    Replies: 123
    Last Post: 07-05-2003, 02:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Powered by Website Maintenance Labs

Copyright ©2000 - 2009; Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.2